On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:52 PM, fred burlingame <tensorpath AT gmail.com>wrote:
> no, it's not a theological question;
>
> it's a literature question and a word meaning question.
>
> regards,
>
> fred burlingame
>
Then why did you include reference to the Talmud, which is completely
unnecessary for a question of literature and word meanings? It was that
reference that makes it into a theological question.
Secondly, when you presented a fuller discussion, it was in the format of a
false dilemma logical fallacy, listing only the British and French models,
when there are more options available, I pointed out one of the other
options.
Final note, don’t use Strong’s numbers, at least not without a back up such
as listing the words themselves. Not everyone uses them.