Skip to Content.
Please activate JavaScript in your web browser
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal
Chronological
Thread
<
Chronological
>
<
Thread
>
From
: fred burlingame <tensorpath AT gmail.com>
To
: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
Cc
: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject
: Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal
Date
: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 08:33:21 -0600
Hello Isaac:
Do you think that this serabit el-khadim inscription represents the
predecessor to the current hebrew alphabet?
And in particular, the letter "L" or lamed? Does it signify a staff or
branch?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Sinaitic_alphabet
regards,
fred burlingame
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu> wrote:
>
It is certainly a good distance from the primitive Hebrew root L to EL
>
ELION. AL and LO are, methinks, in the sense of 'off'.
>
>
Isaac Fried, Boston University
>
[b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal
,
fred burlingame, 12/18/2010
Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal
,
Isaac Fried, 12/18/2010
Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal
,
fred burlingame, 12/18/2010
Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal
,
Isaac Fried, 12/19/2010
Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal
,
fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
Archive powered by
MHonArc 2.6.24
.