From: "Arnaud Fournet" <fournet.arnaud AT wanadoo.fr>
To: "Isaac Fried" <if AT math.bu.edu>
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org, Uri Hurwitz <uhurwitz AT yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] one-to-one rendering of olam (was: Song of Songs1:12)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:21:06 +0100
From: Isaac Fried
Be specific, please, if you think that "proto-Semitic" is more than a
convenient myth.
***
The reasons to accept Proto-Semitic are * exactly * the same reasons that
enables you to talk about Hebrew in the first place.
In spite of more or less obvious differences, all the varieties of Hebrew
are Hebrew because they share a huge amount of features, phonetic,
morphological, lexical, syntactical, etc.
It happens that most of the features are also shared by a set of languages
that have come to be called Semitic.
Proto-Semitic is a synthetic way of describing these features.
There is no descriptive, qualitative nor epistemological discontinuity
between any linguistic variety, characterized as being Hebrew, and
Proto-Semitic.
If you think these features are a myth, then what are the reasons to accept
that Hebrew exists?