Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Biblical Hebrew orthographical practices in light of epigraphy
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 01:15:19 +0300
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32 PM, K Randolph wrote:
> Yitzhak:
>
>> No, it is not. See for example the Use Agreement at
>> http://www.inscriptifact.com/
> For the list, the images are 1) for study purposes, [...]
Karl, I think the license agreement that I sent is pretty clear on
prohibiting any
kind of reduplication without explicit permission. Incidentally, you
might consider
filling out the form and faxing it in...
>> This is really interesting, because I consider the Gezer calendar to be in
>> a possibly cognate language.
I'm going to interject here and ask that you explain why you think the Gezer
calendar to be in Hebrew and not in a cognate language. This will help me in
other cases of possibly Hebrew possibly cognate language inscriptions.
>> See the response to James (probably over your limit) for other examples
>> from Lachish 3:
I see you did not respond to the examples from Lachish 3.
As for Siloam and Gezer, I also see your reading is extremely different from
anything I would consider. Can you please give your transcription and
translation
for these? I don't know if you complete lacunae in any particular
way, but if you
do, I'd appreciate it if you included the text you suggest for the lacunae.
Thanks.
Yitzhak Sapir
Re: [b-hebrew] Biblical Hebrew orthographical practices in light of epigraphy
, (continued)