On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:41 AM, <JimStinehart AT aol.com> wrote:
> Karl:
>
>
>
> You wrote: “You have taken Genesis 31:30 out of context, a logical
> fallacy. Not only have you taken it out of its linguistic context, but also
> its cultural
> context. Once you restore Genesis to its context, then it is talking about a
> completely different event than the Amarna letter, a difference that is
> easily recognized.”
>
>
>
> How have I taken Genesis 31: 30 out of context? Here is how I view the
> context.
>
>
<snip>
There are so many differences that it blows the mind to think that you find
no differences. It would take a long essay (of your sort) to list all the
differences, which, except for you, all the other members of this list
already know them. So for their sakes, I won’t list them. Further, you have
another argument from silence logical fallacy.
… Otherwise, how could all of the many details above match so precisely?
>
>
Maybe one out of ten details match, the other nine don’t. Further, you even
misrepresent some of the details that you claim “match” but don’t really.
> …
>
>
>
> Jim Stinehart
>
> Evanston, Illinois
>
>
Karl W. Randolph.
Re: [b-hebrew] Qadesh of Genesis 20:1
, (continued)