Subject: [b-hebrew] naHHAs versus nahhA$ ---- was previously ----Kadesh-barnea
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:34:11 -0500
[URI HURWITZ] - The words NH$, the name of the Ammonite king in Hebrew, and
NHS, the Arabic name of the ancient smelting enterprise in Khirbat Nahas,
meaning copper, are identical. The Hebrew consonant $ is often the
equivalent of the Arabic S. Compare $alom, Heb. and salam, Arab.
One possibility is that this identity - not just similarity - is a
coincidence, and that would be the end of this matter. Especially since the
Heb. word means "snake", and the Arab. means "copper".
But then the Hebrew word for copper is derived from the same root, and
appears in Fem. form, with an auxillary 'T' - N'ho$et. Compare with
N'hu$tan, the icon destroyed by Hezekiah. Is the name derived from its serpe
[ISHINAN] - Uri, naHHAs is indeed copper or brass in Arabic, while nahhA$
in Arabic is a biting snake (see LisAn al-`Arab vol. vi, p. 730) hence the
apparent confusion in Hebrew. They are from totally different roots, the
former is from nHs root while the latter is from nh$ .
(Arabic phonology: "h" is a voiceless glottal fricative consonant, IPA -
number 146. While "H" is a voiceless pharyngeal fricative consonant, IPA -
number 144 )
I hope this helps
Ishinan Ishibashi
[b-hebrew] naHHAs versus nahhA$ ---- was previously ----Kadesh-barnea,
Ishinan, 04/13/2010