Actually, in response, the entire scenario is off topic. However, the
crux of Gen. 10:25 is the term 'erets, which is on point for the list.
Of the 85X or so it has been used to that point in Genesis, 95% or more
of them can be translated as dry land, without doing any injustice to
the text. Only in a few (Gen. 1:1,2) does it mean the entire planet,
and only in 1 that I could find did it actually refer to the inhabitants
of the planet. Gen. 6:11, but only the first usage in that verse.
Since the term was explicitly defined by the author in Gen. 1:10, the
burden of proof is on those that say it *CANNOT* mean dry land in Gen.
10:25.
Regards,