Dear List Members
I want to invite your evaluation of the BH verbal system as proposed by Wolfgang Schneider and summarized below by John Sailhamer in his class lecture notes.
"In the Hebrew verb system, tense is used to signal the orientation of the speaker to the listener...In Hebrew the choice of tense depends on whether the action is part of a conversation or part of a narration....In Hebrew there are two sets of tense systems: a primary tense and a secondary tense. The primary tense is used to express the main action of a passage in the Hebrew Bible. The primary tense has only two forms.
The secondary tense has only one form. It is used to express actions which lie in the background of those actions expressed in the primary tenses. In the Hebrew Bible, these two tense systems have merged to form one complete system of tenses."
He then identifies the primary tense for narrative as the wayyiqtol and the primary tense for discourse as the yiqtol. The qatal is secondary in both narrative and discourse. I can provide more details if anyone is interested, or even thinks this is a valid approach to the verb. It certainly is radically different from time and aspect models. It seeks to ask not "What type of action does a verb represent?", but rather What type of communication does the verb represent?".
Your thoughts?
Joseph Justiss
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390706/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.