I found an error in that on-line base-converter. It did not return correct
answers for 137, 138, 139 7-base.
Oun.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Oun Kwon <kwonbbl AT gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
FYI,
In his out of print 'Bible Dates itself' (1974,
www.amazon.com/Bible-Dates-Itself<http://www.amazon.com/Bible-Dates-Itself-Arthur-Earle/dp/0960078819/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1247771759&sr=1-1>) Arthur Earle argued for base 7 numeral system to account for the ages in
Patriarchal period (not Noah and antediluvian). A 100 year old in base 7 is
49 year old in base 10; 13 year old is 10 year old in base 10. (
www/base-converter <http://www.easysurf.cc/cnver17.htm#b10toba>)
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.