On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Rolf Furuli wrote:
>
> Dear Yitzhaq,
>
> I have never said that dynamicty cannot be cancelled, but I have said
> that in verbs *marked* for dynamicity, dynamicity cannet be
> cancelled. For example, the verb $yR will in any context be dynamic
> and durative. So, your example is irrelevant to my theory.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rolf Furuli
> University of Oslo
How do you know that "$YR" is "marked for dynamicity" but "NZL"
is (apparently) not? What does it mean "marked for dynamicity"
and how does one objectively measure it?