On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:54 PM, James Read wrote:
Hi Yitzhak,
I've been reading your response over and over again and the only things I
can conclude from it are one of the following:
1) You hold the Philistines to be indigenous with no invasion ever occurring
2) You hold that the Philistines invaded and settled an uninhabited land
Which of these two is it?
Hi, James.
Reading my response once would have been enough :)
I don't think that those are the necessarily only two possibilities nor am I
committed to any particular possibility.
How about you tell me, how do you figure that there were indigenous Philistines
separate from non indigenous Philistines (as apparently you do from your
questions)?
Yitzhak Sapir
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.