it is my pleasure to report recent linguistic findings about the
English tradition of the Torah as shown in manuscript p705xpd fragment
1 which shed light on the true origin of the tradition.
The fragment in question contains, what scholarly consensus agrees to
be, the first three verses of Genesis chapter 1. What is of particular
interest is that this variant reading begins 'In teh beginning'. As
this manuscript predates all extant manuscripts of the English
tradition we conclude this to be the most reliable reading.
As we know that the original form of 'teh' in
proto-doto-western-Semito-English was of a triconsonantal root its
restored form has been reliably established as 'tiyeh'. The form we
see in the manuscript 'teh' has evidently undergone shortening due to
the weak yodh consonant falling out.
We also know that the final he of 'tiyeh' was of matres lectionis
value and by process of elision the form 'tiyeh' evolved from its more
ancient form of 'tiyeha'.
Comparison with the proto-doto-babylonski-Anglo dialect show that
'tiyeha' is cognate of 'tiyemta' (the Shiboleth like saga of the
Umurna letters show that the proto-doto-babylonskis were incapable of
pronouncing a final '-ha' and that their use of a final '-mta' in its
place was indicative of their dialect)
The proto-doto-babylonski-Anglo form 'tiyemta' is a direct linguistic
ancestor of 'Tiamat'. This shows, beyond an absolute shadow of a
doubt, that the oldest manuscript of the English tradition of the
creation account in Genesis 1 is actually a pious fraud based on the
pagan creation accounts of ancient Babylon.
James Christian
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
[b-hebrew] In teh beginning,
James Read, 05/23/2009