I just applied a linguistic analysis of the English language according
to email evidence. The results of my find showed that the English
language has two definite articles 'the' and 'teh'. I tried to discern
rules as to their usage but found that there are no definitively
characteristic usage patterns and the two terms seem to be used
interchangeably.
So, I dug a little further and it would seem that the article 'teh'
comes from language X. I therefore conclude the English were invaders
of the British isles and that their original language was language X.
After a generation or two of occupation in the British isles they
adopted the Britanic language which is the same as English. Their
original language X was completely different and from a totally
different language group (non-Germanic). Unfortunately we have no
manuscript evidence of the invaders speaking language X because they
had already adopted the Britannic language before they started to
write anything. However, the survival of the article 'teh' from
language X shows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that their original
language was language X.
We do have some documents making a claim that the English invaders
were of Germanic descent but I am not willing to consider the
historicity of these claims because the document is of religious
origin and, therefore, suspicious. The survival of the article 'teh'
conclusively proves the inaccuracy of these reports and the invaders
were non-Germanic.
James Christian
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew as a holy language
, (continued)