Here's my question: Can someone give me one or two strong, clear,
undisputed examples of this in the biblical text?
Yours,
Keith McCune
Keith, it is obviously difficult to determine where scribes may have
updated the text since we do not possess copies reflecting the
textual history. The argument can also become circular since we do
not have a large amount of extra-biblical sources giving a baseline
for what constitutes a late versus early feature.
That scribes did modernize texts is shown by the Isaiah scroll from
Qumran (see my summary of Kutscher http://tinyurl.com/ca858a)though
this may have been a popular text and therefore not entirely relevant
for an "official" text. See Tov's _Textual Criticism_ Chapter 4 for
discussion as well (available with limited preview on Google Books).
A good place where we get a glimpse into scribal practice is 2 Sam 22
= Psalm 18 where the poem occurs twice, though both poems seem to
show the effects of the scribes so it is not so easy as to posit one
being the earlier version and the other the later version.
One place that I think may reflect updating is verse 24. Notice that
the Samuel text has W)HYH in the first clause followed by W)$TMRH
while the Psalm text has W)HY followed by W)$TMR. In the later
language the short preterite form is only preserved in the so-called
'waw-consecutive' wayyiqtol form. Because the short preterite has
fallen together with the jussive, eventually it seems that scribes
assumed that the 'waw-consecutive' uses the volative verbal form. In
the 1st person this is the cohortative with the long -a ending
written with H. Thus in later texts (including the Isaiah scroll) the
waw + cohortative form is often substituted where we would expect a
1st person waw-consecutive. The Psalm text has preserved the waw-
consecutive, the Samuel text has probably been updated with a
cohortative form following later scribal practice.
Pete Bekins
[b-hebrew] Updating & Archaizing,
Peter Bekins, 04/16/2009