Dear Yitzhak,
BHS, which uses Leningrad Codex [B19A(L)] has QINNIYM ( קִנִּים ) in Genesis
6:14 and QINIYM ( קִנִים )Ezekiel 2:10.
The NIV Triglot OT, using the text of van der Hooght (1705) as edited by Hahn
(1831) has QINNIYM ( קנִים ) in Genesis 6:14 and QIYNIYM ( קִינִים ) in Ezekiel
2:10.
Thus, it appears that we have two different textual traditions being used.
Rev. Bryant J. Williams III
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yitzhak Sapir" <yitzhaksapir AT gmail.com>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Any meaning to the Dagesh?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Isaac Fried wrote:
Yitzhak,
By writing "qibbacu" you subvert the hebrew text. Apart from the A vowel
that I don't see there, it is written with only one B.
One of us is definitely subverting something.
The QINIYM ( קִנִּים ) of Gn 6:14 is written in QTIB XASER, without a yod,
and the dagesh is appropriately expected after the XIRIQ. The doubling of N
is your own invention. The QIYNIYM ( קִינִים ) of Ez 2:10 is written in
QTIB MALE), with a yod, and appropriately without a dagesh.
This brings up the basic question: Which came first -- your theories or your
version of the Bible? :)
Yitzhak Sapir
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1969 - Release Date: 02/24/09 6:43
AM
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.