David Kummerow wrote:
Hi John,By "base morpheme" I mean the main part of the word - not the prefix (es)
Not sure what you mean by "base morpheme".
or suffix(es).
This should have been clear by my use of the example below of:
<H:A/$OM"R> vs <HA/$.OM"R>:
<$OM"R> = Qal Participle Masculine Singular
<$.OM"R> = Qal Participle Masculine Singular
So lets just focus on the dagesh on the base.
So in the above example the dagesh has no effect on the meaning of the base.
Its Qal Participle Masculine Singular with or without the dagesh.
Are there any examples where the dagesh (and it alone) will change the
meaning?
B"H
John Steven
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.