This is an interesting proposition, but something I have a much harder time
accepting; changing one of the root letters is very significant in Hebrew and
root letter changes that don't reflect a known pattern (such as the Lamed
Hey/Yod roots) would require a lot of evidential support before I would see that
as a valid explanation. Do you know of any references that deal with this
proposition more completely?
Thanks,
Mike Tisdell
San Jose, CA
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.