Pere:
When you think of all the happax legomai nouns and verbs found in Tanakh,
then you wonder if a particular binyan can occur once for a verb used more
often in other binyanim?
A more important question, is RWC ever used as a transitive verb, in which
case a niphal use would not be out of order? 2 Samuel 28:30 "For in such I
run the squad…" looks like such an example.
Karl W. Randolph.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:49 PM, <pporta AT oham.net> wrote:
>> Then, Karl, in your view this NRC (of RWC) would be Niph'al Past, >> third_______________________________________________
>> person singular masculine, with conversive waw attached to it?
>>
>> Pere Porta
>
> Yes.
> Karl W. Randolph.
____
Are you sure that the Niph'al of RWC exists? I realize that neither in the
bible nor in modern Hebrew appears even one form of Niph'al.
Conjugations Qal, Hiph'il, Pol'el, Hitpol'el are found ... but no Niph'al.
Greetings.
Pere Porta
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.