Dear Ytzhak and Yigal,
I do not agree with the currently dominant academic interpretation of
the historical roots of the Biblical narratives. Such disagreement is
permitted in hard sciences where the modern upheavals have
demonstrated the value, if not necessity of sometimes apparently
"crazy" ideas.
How then could I discuss with you my doubts ? Your strict adherence to
the currently dominant academic positions and norms has finally
convinced me to expose here my supra-academic worries in the case, the
real source of my anxiety. Sorry if it might sound for your ears as a
heavy metal music. But let me start.
If it is permitted to question the accepted for centuries authenticity
of the Patriarchal Narratives and, more generally, of the Hebrew
Bible, as well as the good faith of its "creators", it is surely
permitted to question the academic authenticity and the academic good
faith of the Graf-Wellhausen JEPD Theory.
The problem is that, starting with at least Arthur Schopenhauer, the
German school of thought, the academic school of thought including,
has been slowly approaching the vision and the will which, at the
hands of the Nazis, became the academic theory and will of the
extermination of the Jews, starting with their mental and intellectual
extermination from the religious, cultural, and intellectual scenes.
In his book "The World As Will and Representation" (Volume I, Dover
Publications, New York 1969. Translated from the German by E. F. J.
Payne), Schopenhauer writes, as always very eloquently (page 232):
"Historical subjects have a decidedly detrimental effect only when
they restrict the painter to a field chosen arbitrarily, and not for
artistic but for other purposes. This is particularly the case when
this field is poor in picturesque and significant objects, when, for
example, it is the history of a small, isolated, capricious,
hierarchical (i.e., ruled by false notions), obscure people, like the
Jews, despised by the great contemporary nations of the East and of
the West. Since the great migration of peoples lies between us and all
the ancient nations, just as between the present surface of the earth
and the surface whose organisms appear only as fossil remains there
lies the former change of the bed of the ocean, it is to be regarded
generally as a great misfortune that the people whose former culture
was to serve mainly as the basis of our own were not, say, the Indians
or the Greeks, or even the Romans, but just these Jews."
This, in my opinion, explains in particular the primary super-cultural
and meta-scientific motives and purposes of the Graf-Wellhausen JEPD
Theory. These relatively modern (from two hundred to fifty years old)
ideological undercurrents of their and their followers and peers
theories are much better documented and easier verified than those of
the supposed late "creators" of the Biblical narratives. As to the
Archeological data left to itself, it is certainly very far from
speaking so obligatory and single-mindedly in the favour of the
Graf-Wellhausen JEPD Theory or any other similar theory.
This said, I do not simplify, and surely not negate the importance of
the problem of the Bible historical, literaty, and linguistic origins.
I am actually working on an article related to these origins (but not
to the Graf-Wellhausen JEPD Theory, sorry).
It would be certainly a mistake to construe these my remarks,
difficult even for me - a "hard scientist" as I am - to spell out, as
an accusation of those who today believe in, and work on the
Graf-Wellhausen JEPD Theory to be Jews-haters or Jews-bashers. Too
historically guillible ?
Edward G. Belaga
******************************************************
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.