Just out of curiosity:
On 11/11/07, Tory Thorpe <torythrp AT yahoo.com> wrote:
I think we can safely rule out Danuna, a kingdom thought to have been
situated in eastern Cilicia. It is mentioned, for example, in the
Amarna letter EA 151. Then again, the location of Danuna, and at
least the origin of the people Danuna, is a subject of debate. I
suppose it is not impossible for there to have been a well-known
settlement of Danunites in northern Canaan during the time of the
Patriarchs.
Tory Thorpe
Why do you assume that just because there is a name to a geographical
location, that there was a settlement there?
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.