Note:
1. Ehrensvärd's article deals with the entire REMAINDER of so-called indefinite used not treated by Müller. Thus, together, they treat all the examples commonly adduced.
2. Their argument cannot be so simplistically reduced to disagreement with one example: it is the totality of their argument which should be convincing, not a quibble with one example. Thus if the argument is overall convincing, this would then inform isolated examples such as Gen 14:10. Nevertheless, even if one disagrees with ALL of their examples, the fact remains that there still is a possible argument for treating them otherwise as Müller and Ehrensvärd have done.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.