Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:22:47 +0000
On 23/03/2007 00:58, K Randolph wrote:
...
Several times when dealing with people on this list with whom I
disagree, I make my point, show what I think is a flaw in the other's
position, and if he does not answer them, just ignore him. ...
If there is no further answer, I ignore the person. If the person
repeats a logical or factual error, perhaps in a rather different form,
I repeat my objection. I don't want the other person to win the argument
by mere repetition. Who was it who said that a lie repeated often enough
becomes the truth?