'Ethmol and 'emesh together are used only about 13 times: isn't that
I raised the point that the same distributional situation applies in BH:
'ethmol and 'emesh are restricted to qatal and machar is restricted to
yiqtol. My take is that these are tense restrictions: 'ethmol and 'emesh
like English "yesterday" select the past tense while machar like English
"tomorrow" selects the future tense. But given that you reject a
tense-prominent analysis, what is your explanation of this
distributional verbal restriction with temporal adverbs?
Regards,
David Kummerow.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.