I thought Enosh just meant "man." That's what BDB says, among other sources, and it
seems to be used that way fairly frequently.
On 21 Jan 2007 at 15:50, Isaac Fried wrote:
I freely translate Genesis 4:26: "And a child was born also to SHET
and he called him ENOSH, thus began the habit of calling (children)
by the name of God." From this I surmise that ENOSH=EIN+HU+ISH=EINO
+ISH, `he is not man´ was one of the holy names, usurped by SHET
and given to his son.
It appears to me that KMOSH, the god of MOAB (see I Kings 11:7) is
the similar compound KMO+ISH, `like a man´ , .
Isaac Fried, Boston University
On Jan 21, 2007, at 1:07 PM, davidfentonism AT aim.com wrote:
Can anyone shed light on the difference in translation relative to_______________________________________________
Gen 4:26? It appears to say in the Hebrew that, 'Enosh began to
profane [the name of] Y--H Elohiym.' However, it is alternatively
read by Ibn Ezra and Sephorno (also seen in the LXX) as, 'Enosh
began to call upon the name of the LORD.'
Further, is it possible that "men" could actually sanctify the
Name (Kiddush Hashem) or profane the Name (Chillul Hashem) of the
Living G-d? Other than idolatry, how might "men" be said to do or
have done either of these with respect to the Tetragrammaton?
Thanks for your reply,
David Fenton
NYC
____________________________________________________________________ __
__
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-
leading spam and email virus protection.
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Dave Washburn
"Bash the ground until bananas come out."
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.