Yitzhak:
Most of my response was on the level, with only a few statements to
try to reveal to you the ridiculousness of your statements. You are
one of the most dense people I have ever had to deal with,
> The other major point in discussion is the issue of the 22 letter
> alphabet and Hebrew. I had previously asked you how I could tell if
> a language was Hebrew, if it was written in a non-22 letter script but
> in an inscription dated to 1500 BCE. You never responded. As long
> as you fail to provide a way to determine if the language is Hebrew,
> your theory is not falsifiable. It simply assumes that Hebrew is
> always written in a 22 letter alphabet. Any evidence to the contrary
> is disregarded because it's not Hebrew in your opinion. This is
> circular reasoning at its best.
>
In order to show that an inscription were Hebrew though written with a
different alphabet, you need to show a paper trail of the development
of such writing, or a "Rosetta Stone" with both alphabets used to
write the same message in the same language but with different
alphabets. You have failed to show either. Your question is
speculation.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.