Peter, why do you present your ideas as absolute fact? In all honesty yourSince you have snipped my original post and changed the subject line, I don't know which ideas you are referring to. But I don't make any claim to "absolute fact" in these matters, except for what is in a book in front of my eyes, the number of manuscripts quoted in the introduction to the Nestle-Aland text. However, if you prefer I will withdraw
theories are really little more than a school of thought on the subject.
Dr. A.T. Robertson who has enriched us all with his work " A Grammar of the
Greek New Testament in the light of Historical Research" only identifies a
"thousandth part of the entire text" of the New Testament as presenting any
real concern. A little humility would greatly assist in your ability to
think objectively.
a textual tradition which had already become seriously corrupt during the
Byzantine period
a textual tradition concerning which I would expect that anyone who actually
compared the Greek texts would quickly conclude that it had already become
seriously corrupt during the Byzantine period
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.