> > Rolf, do you want supporters like this?
>
> I don't think it's Rolf's fault or his theories' that Vadim supports him.
> It's also not something that should really concern him.
Where's the support, though? Like Rolf, I believe that wayiqtol is a late
development of weyiqtol. As for the Rolf's idea that waw has no conversive
function, my understanding is just the opposite: waw is consistently
employed as conversive device.