I agree that God is holy, but perhaps we also define holiness differently.
I
don't define it to include "good."
God exhibits his holiness through his
awesome power, as is said repeatedly.
We could discuss the biblical flood as well. That too was evil and God
regretted it.
It seems that if God regretted it, it couldn't have been good.
Unless you define good so that anything that happens in nature is good. If
cancer is good, a judgment for sin you'd say, why should we have doctors? If
polio was good, why should we have had doctors who eradicated it completely?
Should we not try to eradicate cancer as we did polio?
Should we not build earthquake-proof houses and better warning systems to
protect against the times when God's holiness bursts out?
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.