I agree with Shoshanna, the beasts referred only to the kingdoms as
political entities only, not the individual kings.
The king or a line of kings was a horn on the beast. I don't remember
a single case where a beast, at least in Daniel, that an individual
king was typified by a beast of his own. Can anyone think of any
exceptions?
Karl W. Randolph.
On 9/8/06, Shoshanna Walker <rosewalk AT concentric.net> wrote: