I'm always curious when I hear Christians disagree with the rulings oftheHH: I guess you missed the post by Michael Abernathy. He wrote:
Sanhedrin and the Pharisees in general. It doesn't seem to be inagreement
with what their scriptures say. One verse that is key to howChristians should
understand the rabbis (in my opinion) is this:
"The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat. So youmust obey
them and do everything they tell you. But do not do whatthey do, for they do not
practice what they preach." (Matthew 23:2-3,NIV)
What is the seat of Moses? The 70 elders were appointed by Moses tohandle
questions of ritual and justice. The authority given to these70 passed down
to the Sanhedrin, and also to the rabbis (this accountsfor the variation in
appointments seen in Exodus 18:
"But select capable men from all the people—men who fear God,trustworthy men who
hate dishonest gain—and appoint them as officialsover thousands, hundreds, fifties and
tens." (Exodus 18:21, NIV)
Why down to tens? Because a congregation exists when you have tenpeople, a
minyan. Thus, there were to be those who make decisions andhave authority
only over their congregation (a rabbi), and also thosewho had authority to be
binding over the whole nation (the Sanhedrin).
This is completely biblical. Why would you think that the Sanhedrindid not
exist (I'm not saying by name) since the time of Moses to thetime of the
Second Temple?
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.