Peter:Karl, Wikipedia is indeed an uncertain source, but that is not any kind of evidence that any particular statement made in it is incorrect. In fact probably more than 90%, maybe even more than 99%, are correct. It's not 100%. But it is still more probable that any one statement is true than that it is false.
You shouldn't take umbrage to what David said. You yourself admit that
wikipedia is an uncertain source, and that's all David intimated. Or
at least that's how I read his statement.
Even if all the experts agreed (in this case, they don't, because this
controversy exists), that does not mean they are correct.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.