> Dear Yigal, You wrote:
>
Tradition considers Malachi,
> >a.k.a. Ezra (and yes, I know that there's no scriptual basis for that
> >identification!)
To which I respond:
Huh?
Hmm.
Very interesting.
But why is the identification necessary?
Liz Fried
Ann Arbor
Re: [b-hebrew] daughters jacob never spoke of
, (continued)