On 26/10/2005 11:57, Yigal Levin wrote:
...This is a problem whether or not one believes in creation in a literal period of six times 24 hours. On the first "day" God created light and separated it from darkness, and the mention of "evening and morning" makes it clear that he already started a regular sequence of light and dark periods, called "day" and "night". But the sun was not created until later. Whether this was two days or millions of years later is immaterial. From verse 15 it is clear that the author knew that the sun was the source of daylight; nevertheless, he wrote that there was daylight before the sun was created. How can this apparent contradiction be resolved? It doesn't make any difference to interpret "day" either literally or non-literally.
In any case, a "creationist" would have to explain the first three "days", before the creation of the sun.
One rather obvious suggestion is that the creation is viewed from a viewpoint on earth. At first, perhaps, the earth was covered by clouds (and geologists agree with this) so that the sun would not have been visible, but there would still have been day and night. Only later, on the third "day", the clouds cleared and the sun, moon and stars became visible.
--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.