From: "Jerry Shepherd" <jerry.shepherd AT taylor-edu.ca>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Leviral marriage
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:33:14 -0600
James,
While your deduction is one that could be made from the evidence, it
must also be considered that God could have given laws to regulate a
practice to which he was in fact opposed. John Goldingay, in his book,
Approaches to Old Testament Interpretation, remarked that "Legislation
by its very nature is a compromise between what may be ethically
desirable and what is actually feasible given the relativities of social
and political life." In the New Testament, Jesus himself seems to say
the same thing (Matt 19:8). So I think a more appropriate and properly
nuanced stance to take is to say that God gave laws condoning and
regulating a practice which he had not in fact prescribed.
-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Read, James C
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 3:54 AM
To: bill.rea AT canterbury.ac.nz; b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Leviral marriage
Agreed! It is clear that if Yah is to provide laws concerning polygamous