Skip to Content.
Please activate JavaScript in your web browser
List archive
[b-hebrew] LXX transliterations
Chronological
Thread
<
Chronological
>
<
Thread
>
From
: "Dr. Joel M. Hoffman" <joel AT exc.com>
To
: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject
: [b-hebrew] LXX transliterations
Date
: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:30:03 -0400 (EDT)
>
Gemination is, of course, simply post-tonic (Calanni - stress shift
>
and the resulting gemination).
I don't think so. I refer you again to the table:
http://www.exc.com/JoelHoffman/Excerpts/ITB-p95.pdf
The Masoretes record RIVKAH and ZILPAH, but the LXX gives us REBEKKA
and ZILFA. Either the LXX transliteration is inconsistent or the
Masoretic rendering is inaccurate.
-Joel M. Hoffman
http://www.exc.com/JoelHoffman
[b-hebrew] LXX transliterations
,
Dr. Joel M. Hoffman, 10/14/2005
Re: [b-hebrew] LXX transliterations
,
Vadim Cherny, 10/16/2005
Re: [b-hebrew] LXX transliterations
,
Dr. Joel M. Hoffman, 10/16/2005
Re: [b-hebrew] LXX transliterations
,
Peter Kirk, 10/17/2005
<Possible follow-up(s)>
[b-hebrew] LXX transliterations
,
Dr. Joel M. Hoffman, 10/14/2005
Archive powered by
MHonArc 2.6.24
.