Gen 2:5 seems to describe the reasons why there were no cultivated
Cultivated? This is your imagination at work. The text says nothing of the sort.
Maybe it does:
1. The context implies that whatever is meant by שיח השדה and עשב השדה, they require work from the man and water to grow.
2. Why are שיח and עשב qualified here when they need not be?Elsewhere they appear alone, so it seems likely that adding השדה
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.