>Mark: But that's by no means certain. The LXX understood it as a construct.
But the form is the same as a non-construct plural. The only two other times>construct.
that this exact form ZaROTH is used in the Hebrew Bible (Job 5:19 and Psalm
71:20, see also Psalm 46:2; Deut. 31:17 & 21) the form is definitely NOT
Wouldn't the construct form be C:ROWT with sheva, not qamats, according
to regular rule for shortening of construct forms? If so, that would
tend to confirm that this is an absolute form.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.