I was not going to answer your response unless you
added new data, and you did:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yitzhak Sapir" <yitzhaksapir AT gmail.com>
>
> In fact, how do you know Onkelos wasn't given to Moses?
> Where does the Onkelos say that it wasn't? So if you go by
> tradition for dating the Torah, you should go by tradition for the
> Zohar and Onkelos too, and date them accordingly, and then
> you have it -- complete and extensive religious texts from the time
> of Moses in Aramaic.
>
> ...
>
> I haven't. I relate to the Hebrew data the same way as
> the statue -- the time it is dated. The Massoretic data is
> dated according to the date of the manuscript whether it
> is the Leningrad Codex, or the Aleppo Codex. The DSS
> the same. The statue the same. All data on the same
> grounds. Like I said, by your method of dating, you'd need
> to consider Onkelos and the Zohar as originating in the
> time of Moses.
>
Do you know how ridiculous this sounds?
>
> Yitzhak Sapir
This, and the rest of your message are not worth
answering.