I wote several times that I imagine only two possible ways to prove deictic shift: psychoanalysis of a writer and analyzing the context. Deictic shifts I mentioned are contextually plausible. ...
In some cases, maybe, in other cases, no. Anyway, you need to do better than to say that the deictic shift is plausible, you need to demonstrate that it has actually occurred.
We agree that a hypothesis must be falsifiable to be properly scientific. What we disagree on is whether this particular hypothesis is falsifiable.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.