Anyway, I didn't Raamses in the 10th century and your misunderstanding[end quote]
on this is based on a (bad) interpretation of what I wrote. I was saying
that both a date of tenth century for the exodus and the concurrent pharoah
being RaamsesII were demonstrably false. That you tie the two together
is your own perogative but not what I intended you to understand.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.