Not too long ago, we had a conversation here about שטן &+N in 1
Chronicles 21. The most common reading of this word in that verse is
as a proper noun, a point on the way toward the later, full-blown
concept of Satan/the Devil. Most (professional) interpreters
apparently think that the Chronicler could not abide the idea of YHWH
inciting David to do something that David later characterizes as sin
and that YHWH later punishes David for having done as per 2 Samuel
24. During that conversation, I suggested an alternate possibility:
that the Chronicler uses שטן &+N in 1 Chron 21 as a typical common
anarthrous noun, and does not mean to tell a fundamentally different
story from 2 Sam 24, but is using (anarthrous) שטן &+N "an
adversary" as a kind of circumlocation referring to 2 Sam 24's "the
anger of YHWH," much as the "angel of YHWH" stands as (anarthrous)
שטן &+N "an adversary."
At the CBA meeting recently I had a conversation about this with a
couple of folks over lunch, one of whom suggested that שטן &+N
could also be read in 1 Chron 21 as a common noun with a purely non-
supernatural referent. That is, this individual agreed with the usual
consensus that the Chronicler was uncomfortable with what he read in
the Deuteronomistic version, but instead of substituting a different
supernatural force, substituted a completely generic, human
"adversary," a vague military threat, which incited David to take the
census. I have not yet thought very much about whether סות SWT
could be used in quite this way, but I found the thought intriguing
enough to share with all of you who followed that earlier thread.