Basically, we differ on methodology, and until we can
come to a consensus on that, we will never come to a
consensus on the other issues that divide us. You
believe the scholarly consensus is infallible;
While you base your
studies on scholars and traditions, I base mine on
methodology. One part of the methodology is that it is
very rare for a lexeme to have two or more distinctly
different definitions. Another part is to use an
unpointed text. Another is where there are synonyms
and antonyms recognized, that comparisons with these
can help. And there are others.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.