...I am suggesting that a compound lexeme is a made up of two or more words which are (usually) lexemes in their own right but where the meaning of the whole is something different from the sum of the meanings of the parts. That is certainly true of MILLE' YAD, as of Karl's English examples "strike out" and "strike up". Of course Karl's definition may be a little different from mine, so let's see what he says.
Isn't there a difference between a phrase and a compound lexeme? You have cited a phrase which is rendered in English as "ordain" but in Hebrew it simply means "fill the hands". Are you suggesting that if a word in English is the manifestation of a phrase in Hebrew that it is a compound lexeme?
Correct me if I am wrong, but did not Moses put something into their hands during the consecration ceremony, hence "filling their hands"? Thus "filling their hands" was a referral back to that action?I don't think there is any record of any physical item being put into the hands of the priests. Metaphorically, I suppose some kind of authority was put into their hands. But I would accept that there is a fine line between compound lexemes and metaphor. "Strike out" can similarly be understood in terms of metaphor, and "strike up" doesn't even need a metaphor when you realise that it is an extended sense of striking drums and/or strings.
Lev 19.17 WaY.aQ:R"B )eT_HaM.iN:XfH WaY:MaL.") CaP.oW MiM.eN.fHYou have the wrong reference here. I think you mean 9:17, and KaP.oW rather than CaP.oW. Note that 1) this is not part of the ordination ceremony, but the start of Aaron's regular ministry 2) the word used is KAP not YAD 3) the priest is filling his own palm whereas ordination was done by someone else, Moses in the case of Aaron 4) ordination is not just a matter of filling someone's hand with grain, but has a very specific significance which goes far beyond this.
As you can see, the priest received part of the offering.
My understanding is that compound lexemes are rare due to the nature
of Hebrew, but isn't the most obvious one (that comes to my mind at least)
"bly(l" of "bl(y)" and "y(l"? ...
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.