...
I disagree here. While, you can be conclusive that the subject is different
if the gender is different, you cannot be equally conclusive just because the
gender is the same.
This is not the only case in scripture where the agent is ambiguous and it is
clear that the chronicler, whose hebrew was better than ours, did not understand
the agent to be Yah's anger but 'an adversary' or Satan himself.
Your interpretation of the verse does not make sense.
Yah got angry because David obeyed him?????
The chronicler, evidently, was not led to understand such a thing and so his
version of events clears the ambiguity by making the agent of the second clause
explicit.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.