No, by the standard rules of Hebrew conjugations, the hiphil "imperfect" of HWH would be yahwe, and the qal "imperfect" would be yahwe, yehwe or perhaps yihwe.In a word where all four letters are special cases, any pronunciation couldBesides your imagined hophal Yahwe, ...This is not a hophal, but either a qal or a hiphil.
be conjectured, but neither paal or hiphil could straightforwardly become
Yahwe; this requires considerable juggling.
I offered as proof that in Greek OU, omicron-upsilon, is always a unit. Also, although I didn't mention it, the form Iao in Greek always ends with omega. Now I accept that IAOU might be a variant of IAW and IAOUE might be IAOU plus a final -e syllable represented in Hebrew by he. But that is not quite what Vadim has written.I already answered this. Iaoue is quite evidently Iao+h. ...No. I will not repeat my proof that it is not.
You offered no proof, but simply attacked my non-existent assertion that he
became ue. I wrote, he became e, and u bridges Iao(u)e.
IAOUE and IABE independently confirm one another
Only if you omit u, about which you argue in the previous example.
It is also doubtful that omega and beta record the same sound. ...
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.