Dear Peter,Rolf, I don't understand your problem here. I know you don't agree with my understanding of WAYYIQTOL. But you seemed to present these as examples of how your understanding must be correct, and by implication mine incorrect. Indeed you apparently made a claim earlier in that posting to have falsified the model "aspects with the opposition complete/completed versus incomplete", which is similar to the model I had in mind (which also includes a discourse-related element similar to Bryan's). My point here was to show that these verses can be understood according to such a model, and thus that this model is not falsified at least by these examples.
Your arguments below are of such a nature that I am considering whether there is any purpose in answering your posts any more.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.