On Friday 22 July 2005 18:57, Peter Kirk wrote:
On 22/07/2005 19:22, Harold R. Holmyard III wrote:[snip]
... The Aramaic behind Matthew isThe former is Aramaic, but the latter is surely Hebrew. The Aramaic, if
êlî êlî lmâ ”vaqtanî. Whereas Mark has elohî
elohî.
not êlî, might be elahî, but not elohî.
Not necessarily. ... It is also likely, as I have said before, that Jesus' words were rather slurred, considering his physical condition by the time he reached this point. ...
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.