On 7/5/05 5:43 PM, "David Kummerow" <farmerjoeblo AT hotmail.com> wrote:
> de Regt's paper has actually been published:
>
> de Regt, L?nart. "Hebrew Syntactical Inversions and their Literary
> Equivalence in Robert Alter's Translation of Genesis." The Bible Translator
> 54 (2003): 111-121.
I am a little bit curios about this. Why would L. de Regt write a critique
of Alter's translation of Genesis? Kind of like a house painter writing a
critique of Mark Rothko. Does anyone have the article in electronic form?
Would be nice to see it.
Clay Bartholomew
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.