Hi Luke, you wrote:A closer look shows that there is no ambiguity in BHS. The vowels of the first occurrence are ambiguous, but the accent, on the first syllable of YAXAD, in both cases implies the adverb (originally a noun) "together", with a retracted "segholate" accent, rather than a verb, which would always be stressed on the last syllable. Also the second occurrence is vocalised with two patahs, which implies the adverb, rather than with qamats and patah as for the verb. The first occurrence has qamets and patah because the stressed patah has changed to qamets "in pause" i.e. on the major sentence accent, by a regular rule. So the Masoretic text unambiguously rules out a verb form here, and strongly suggests the adverb "together". And this makes sense if we consider the force of magnetism, which indeed unites pieces of iron in a way comparable to close friendship - a rather more appropriate image than welding, in my opinion.
The Hebrew sentence in question, without the vowels, is as follows: -
brzl bbrzl yhd w'yš yhd pny r'hw
The dispute is over the vowel points in Hebrew word that's translated
traditionally as 'sharpens', or possibly as 'united'. Without the
vowel points the Hebrew word is ' yhd ', I think (sorry if that's
not how the MCW puts it).
Actually, I don't see what vowels have to do with it. Even with the vowels as in the BHS, the word is ambiguous, meaning "together" or "it (he) sharpens."
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.