On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:59:26 +0000 Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>George, as hard as you and others are trying to cast me into the role of your opponents on this, the role I am playing is that of an impartial judge, trying to assess both sides of the matter without taking sides. Both sides have presented a case, but I have so far found both of them wanting in proper proof. And I don't call arguments from silence proper proof, from either side.
writes:
On 16/03/2005 17:45, George F Somsel wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:16:04 +0000 Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>What
writes:
Ah, yes, the old "we just haven't found the evidence yet" argument.
would you say if we were to dig up the entire country? We didn'tdig
deep enough? We're on the wrong side of the Jordon?I am just holding to the principle of "innocent until proved guilty". And a negative cannot be proved. So what is the positive proof?
...
And since it is a negative to say that the Exodus / Conquest may not have
occurred it can never be proven? There's nothing like rigging the game,
is there?
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.